Juvenile Case Shows Kids Treated Like Adults in Criminal Cases
A case out of Rhode Island, In re Frances G. reminds Los Angeles juvenile defense lawyers just how daunting the criminal justice system can be for young people.
In this case, a 12-year-old girl was found to have committed a crime even though police enticed her to give a statement and third-hand testimony was allowed to be used against her at trial.

Juvenile charges in Los Angeles can range from less-serious theft cases to assault and murder. When teenagers and other young people are arrested, they are likely scared and don't know what to do. The best thing a parent can do is get them to an experienced lawyer.
Before making a statement to police, which can be used against him or her, the defendant should speak with a lawyer, who can give them sound legal advice that can help them in the future of the case.
In this case, the 12-year-old traveled in 2009 with her mother to a relative's house to recover some property. When the relative wouldn't answer, the mother and daughter continued knocking and using vulgar language. The relative then heard her daughter scream out "Willa is at your car with a brick."
The woman got out of bed and saw the vehicle driving away and noticed the front windshield of her car had been smashed, and that there were dents and scratches in the side of the vehicle.
Later that day, the girl was with her father when police contacted them and said they wanted to see the young girl. They voluntarily went to the police station and the officer told them he was investigating the incident from earlier in the day. He asked her for a "general breakdown of what transpired" before he gave her Miranda warnings. Miranda warnings are the rights that officers tell suspects that give them the opportunity to remain silent and telling them that anything they do say can be used against them in court.
After they spoke briefly, the officer gave her a printed form of her rights with her father by her side. She then proceeded to admit to damaging the vehicle and said she was completely responsible for it. She was found to be wayward in the Rhode Island juvenile court and was sentenced to one year on probation and 30 hours of community service.
On appeal, her attorneys argued that the relative shouldn't have been able to testify about what her daughter said she saw -- which is considered hearsay evidence. They also argued that the statement Frances gave to police shouldn't have been admitted because the statement violated her Fifth Amendment rights.
The Rhode Island Supreme Court, however, rejected both arguments and upheld the conviction for the girl. They stated that the "excited utterance" was admissible and that because she wasn't under arrest when she walked into the police station and because there was no evidence of coercion or threats, her statement to police should stand.
This shows that juveniles are given no additional leeway than adult criminal suspects in the eyes of the police, prosecution or judges. Therefore, ensuring that their rights are protected and that they have strong legal advice at all stages of the proceeding are necessary.
Continue reading "Juvenile Case Shows Kids Treated Like Adults in Criminal Cases" »






