Bay Area Rape Case Shows Sex Crimes Prosecutions in Los Angeles Can Be Undermined By Credibility Issues
A recent rape case in a district attorney's office near the San Francisco Bay area blew the cover off of an office atmosphere where crude sexual behavior was rampant. But it also shows that witness credibility in Los Angeles sex crimes cases is key to the prosecution and the defense.
In any sex case, the credibility of the witness is going to be a big factor. In cases where there aren't any eye witnesses other than the alleged victim, it becomes even more critical to the state's case. Any person can make up allegations of a sex crime, but without physical proof -- such as DNA or fingerprints -- that prove a person was in the place the alleged victim says the crime occurred, words matter.

And as Los Angeles criminal defense lawyers have seen, who is saying those words is just as important sometimes as what is said. In this case, a person's credibility has derailed the prosecution of an alleged rape.
According to the Los Angeles Times, a 54-year-old prosecutor in Martinez, outside San Francisco, was charged with rape after a co-worker alleged that he had raped her during their lunch break in a case where they prosecuted a person for molestation.
The two had had a sexual encounter before and she said he was "pretty kinky," but she alleged that when he used ice cubes, an ice pick, handcuffs and a gun that caused bleeding, it was rape. He admitted to having rough sex, but said it was consensual.
A judge dismissed the charges recently because while the grand jury heard the woman's side of the story, they didn't hear facts that could have undermined her credibility. They include the fact that she reported the rape to her bosses and they did nothing for four months and even allowed the two to work together, showing they didn't believe her.
The newspaper reports that the 33-year-old woman was a part-time employee who had done poorly on job evaluations and hadn't been offered a full-time position. Some believe she had a motivation to lie in order to free up a position. Her boss was more concerned about her suing if she wasn't offered a job than believing she was telling the truth. She also didn't want to report the case at first.
As the three-year-old case was ongoing, investigation revealed that the sex crimes unit for the district attorney was called a "sex club" by workers there, who would discuss their sexual adventures over lunch and drinks. Some said they enjoyed prosecuting sex crimes because it gave them ideas for the bedroom. And the workers would have co-ed "slumber parties."
Because of the conflict of interest of someone in the office prosecuting a co-worker, the attorney general's office handled the case. The newspaper reports the office is deciding whether to appeal the ruling or file new charges. They say they will take the wishes of the woman, who has since moved to Florida, into consideration.


