Supreme Court Limits L.A. Police Vehicle Searches
In a new ruling in an Arizona case, the U.S. Supreme Court has called a halt to what some justices called 28 years of unconstitutional police search and seizure practices in the U.S. In a 5-4 ruling, the court ruled that once a suspect has been handcuffed or placed in a police cruiser, police cannot search the passenger compartments of the suspect's vehicle without a warrant. The court ruled that the only instances in which a vehicle can be searched without a warrant are:
- If the officer has reason to believe that the suspect might destroy evidence or reach for a weapon.
- If the officer has reason to suspect that the vehicle contains evidence of the offense that precipitated the arrest.
- If there is probable cause for a search, such as the smell of marijuana or alcohol or visible contraband.
The American Civil Liberties Union said the Supreme Court's 1981 landmark vehicle search ruling had for years been abused by law enforcement officers well beyond the limits placed by the Fourth Amendment. The majority of Supreme Court justices agreed, saying that the new ruling was needed to rein in unjust searches and seizures and remind law enforcement officers of privacy rights that limit searches. There is some concern within the law enforcement community that the new ruling will impede drug arrests made during traffic stops.
If you are stopped by Los Angeles Police Department or California law enforcement officers and feel that your vehicle has been unjustly searched or your property unjustly seized, contact the expert criminal defense attorneys at Rodriguez, Lewis & Kahn to arrange a free consultation to review the facts of your case. The new Supreme Court ruling reinstates the Constitutional rights of individual citizens to be free of unjust police search and seizure. You can count on the experienced criminal defense lawyers at Rodriguez, Lewis & Kahn to protect your rights.


